Does the Free Version Fail on Purpose?
I uploaded a decent, well-lit selfie just to see what their "AI Maker" could do. The processing speed was genuinely shocking—it was done in maybe three seconds.
10 Views

I uploaded a decent, well-lit selfie just to see what their "AI Maker" could do. The processing speed was genuinely shocking—it was done in maybe three seconds.
The secret isn't just the software; it's the source image. You have to give it a perfectly sharp, uniformly lit photo—no shadows, no blur, high native resolution. If you feed it garbage, the AI is just guessing, and it looks awful. I found that different platforms excel at different things. For anyone serious about testing the limits of what these programs can do, you need a specialized tool that focuses on clothes removal accuracy, which is why I use https://undress.app/ai-clothes-remover. That specific model is much better at complex fabric textures and shadows than the generic versions. It's frustrating to pay, but spending three hours in Photoshop trying to fix a low-res free image is way worse than just paying a couple of bucks for a clean result that's instantly ready to go in your chosen "favorite mode and resolution." It's definitely a case where the "free!" option is just a demonstration, not a usable tool. It makes you realize how much processing power they save by crippling the basic version.